Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Do State Policies Matter in Prosecutor-Reported Juvenile Marijuana Case Disposition?

  • Yvonne M. Terry-McElrath
  • , Jamie F. Chriqui
  • , Hannalori Bates
  • , Duane C McBride
  • University of Michigan - Ann Arbor
  • University of Illinois at Chicago
  • St. Louis University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article examines outcomes for first-time juvenile marijuana possession offenders based on relationships between state policy and local prosecutor self-reported decision making. Specifically, relationships between state statutory penalty data for low-level marijuana possession offenses and prosecutor-reported case outcomes for first-offender juvenile marijuana possession cases are examined. A national sample of prosecutors was interviewed in 2000. Analyses included state statutory policy data in effect as of January 1, 1999, as well as community sociodemographic controls. Results indicated that state statutory policy significantly related to prosecutor-reported juvenile court processing as well as diversion and transfer to criminal court. State statutory policy appears to play a significant role among the legal, resource, and extralegal factors that affect prosecutorial discretion regarding juvenile substance offenders.
Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)402-426
JournalCrime & Delinquency
Volume60
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2010

Keywords

  • marijuana
  • drug policy
  • prosecutor
  • prosecutorial discretion
  • juvenile

Disciplines

  • Juvenile Law
  • Substance Abuse and Addiction

Cite this