TY - JOUR
T1 - Emerging Decolonialized Research Collaboration
T2 - The Max Planck Society and the Leibniz Association in Latin America
AU - Pineda, Pedro
AU - Gregorutti, Gustavo
AU - Streitwieser, Bernhard
N1 - Pineda, P., Gregorutti, G., & Streitwieser, B. (2020). Emerging Decolonialized Research Collaboration: The Max Planck Society and the Leibniz Association in Latin America. Journal of Studies in International Education, 24(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315319888891
PY - 2020/2/1
Y1 - 2020/2/1
N2 - Analyzing the number of publications and proportion of corresponding authors of Latin American scholars and scholars from the German Max Planck Society (MPS) and the Leibniz Association (LA; 1954–2018), this article asks if North–South partnerships continue to represent power imbalances. Our bibliometric analysis indicates that (a) in comparison with the LA, the MPS’s scientists published more articles with Latin American countries, led by Brazil, Chile, Argentina, and Mexico; (b) researchers from the MPS and the LA frequently took the role of corresponding author; (c) researchers from Brazil, Chile, Argentina, and Mexico primarily controlled their region’s productivity, but (d) Brazil built its own multinational research networks; and (e) countries with less productivity, such as Colombia and Uruguay, are on peripheries of research networks. Our findings indicate that the decolonial perspective needs further development to identify multipolar relationships of dominance and collaboration have developed out of a dichotomy world of North–South relations.
AB - Analyzing the number of publications and proportion of corresponding authors of Latin American scholars and scholars from the German Max Planck Society (MPS) and the Leibniz Association (LA; 1954–2018), this article asks if North–South partnerships continue to represent power imbalances. Our bibliometric analysis indicates that (a) in comparison with the LA, the MPS’s scientists published more articles with Latin American countries, led by Brazil, Chile, Argentina, and Mexico; (b) researchers from the MPS and the LA frequently took the role of corresponding author; (c) researchers from Brazil, Chile, Argentina, and Mexico primarily controlled their region’s productivity, but (d) Brazil built its own multinational research networks; and (e) countries with less productivity, such as Colombia and Uruguay, are on peripheries of research networks. Our findings indicate that the decolonial perspective needs further development to identify multipolar relationships of dominance and collaboration have developed out of a dichotomy world of North–South relations.
KW - North–South partnerships
KW - research administration
KW - research networks
KW - institutional research
KW - research collaboration
KW - science mapping
KW - bibliometric review
UR - https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/pubs/1324
M3 - Article
SN - 1028-3153
VL - 24
SP - 59
EP - 78
JO - Journal of Studies in International Education
JF - Journal of Studies in International Education
IS - 1
ER -