Abstract
The study of the composition of the Pentateuch has been at the center of critical scholarship since the nineteenth century. While there is general agreement that the Graf-Wellhausen documentary hypothesis, as originally presented, is untenable, most of current Pentateuchal research has worked within the framework of the existence of divergent sources that underwent a number of editorial changes. Considering the basic physical law of input determining output, this study challenges the basic presupposition of the existence of divergent sources and calls for a fresh approach to the hermeneutics of the Pentateuch that approaches the biblical text on its own terms and that does not a priori negate the notion of inspiration, thus challenging the philosophical and methodological presuppositions of standard historical-critical scholarship. As a starting point for this new conversation, it offers seven thesis statements focusing on basic hermeneutics as well as promising methodological approaches that may point this important discussion beyond the well-worn tracks of critical scholarship.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-30 |
| Journal | DavarLogos |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| State | Published - May 18 2020 |
Keywords
- Hermeneutics
- Pentateuch
- Graf-Wellhausen
- Old Testament
- Historical-Critical method
Disciplines
- Biblical Studies
Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS